Which CMS Architecture Do You Need?
Short answer: Contentful is a headless CMS for composable, multi-channel content and needs a separate front end; Framer combines visual design, CMS and hosting for fast, search-ready marketing sites. Miro is moving its marketing site from a complex headless setup to Framer with us.
TL;DR: our take:
Dominik Hofer
Engineering Lead at Trueform
Framer
Framer combines a visual design canvas, CMS, managed hosting, and publishing workflow for marketing websites. Teams can create structured pages, manage metadata, improve information hierarchy, and ship content updates without a separate front-end build. That makes Framer especially useful when SEO and answer engine optimization rely on frequent, well-crafted page improvements.
Curious what it costs? Our published prices start at $25K for a full Framer marketing website.
Architecture
Visual site builder, CMS, and hosting in one
SEO setup
Metadata, redirects, and fast delivery are built in
AEO readiness
Clear page structure and structured data workflows
Publishing speed
Design and content updates ship from one canvas
Page performance
Managed hosting and image optimization by default
Best for
High-performing marketing and content sites
How do SEO and AEO differ between Contentful and Framer?
Contentful supplies flexible content infrastructure; Framer brings content, presentation, and publishing together .
Is Framer more than a headless CMS?
Framer is a visual publishing platform.
Publish structured, useful pages faster
Build page templates, CMS collections, landing pages, and editorial hubs in a single visual workspace.
Support the signals search engines can use
Strong information hierarchy, descriptive content and metadata controls, redirects.
Give marketing ownership of continuous improvement
The team closest to the audience can refine FAQs, comparison pages, category pages, and supporting content.
When to use which
Use Contentful when:
You need one content source to power several apps, websites, and channels.
You have developers owning a custom front end and deployment pipeline.
Your content model has enterprise-level complexity, permissions, or integrations.
You need a composable CMS rather than a visual website platform.
Use Framer when:
Organic growth depends on quickly publishing and improving marketing pages.
Technical SEO, page experience, and fast delivery need to be simple to maintain.
Marketers and designers should own content structure and page-level SEO updates.
You want a unified workflow for CMS content, design, hosting, and analytics.
Coming from a different stack?
Compare Framer to:
Astro
Short answer: Astro is an open-source framework developers use to build fast, content-driven sites in code; Framer is a visual platform where marketers design, edit and publish the site themselves. Choose Astro if engineers own the website, Framer if marketing should.
See more
Craft CMS
Short answer: choose Craft CMS when developers need a fully bespoke content model and own the templates; choose Framer when marketing should design, edit and publish pages without a release. Both can run a serious company site; the difference is who owns change.
See more
Sanity
Short answer: Sanity is the better fit when one content source has to feed several apps, sites and channels through APIs; Framer is the better fit when the website is the main channel and marketing should ship pages without a front-end release.
See more
OpenAI Codex
Short answer: OpenAI Codex helps developers write and change code; Framer is where a design and marketing team builds, edits and publishes the website itself. Use Codex for custom software, Framer for a marketing site the whole team keeps improving.
See more
Claude Code
Short answer: Claude Code helps developers explore, write and change code from the terminal; Framer is where designers and marketers build, edit and publish the website themselves. Use Claude Code for custom software, Framer for a marketing site your team keeps improving.
See more
Replit
Short answer: Replit is a browser-based workspace for building and deploying software; Framer is a visual platform for designing and publishing marketing websites. Pick Replit for an app or internal tool, Framer for a polished site your marketing team runs.
See more
Lovable
Short answer: Lovable turns prompts into app prototypes; Framer is built to design, publish and keep refining a company marketing website. Use Lovable to test a product idea, Framer for the site that sells it.
See more
Squarespace
Short answer: Squarespace is the quicker choice for a simple, template-based site with built-in commerce or bookings; Framer is the better choice for a distinctive B2B or SaaS marketing site that grows with CMS content, localization and testing.
See more
Wix
Short answer: Wix makes it easy to get a site online with templates and built-in business tools; Framer is the better choice for a distinctive B2B or SaaS marketing site your team keeps shaping, testing and localizing.
See more
WordPress
Short answer: WordPress is free, open-source software you host, update and extend with plugins; Framer is a visual platform with hosting, CDN and CMS built in. Choose WordPress for full server control or a plugin-heavy setup, Framer for a fast marketing site your team edits without maintenance.
See more
Webflow
Short answer: both are visual builders with a CMS and hosting. Framer works like a design tool, with localization, A/B testing and analytics built in; Webflow works like a visual developer environment with CSS-level control. Gather moved from Webflow to Framer with us in two months.
See more
